Summer in the Central scientific article Anti Feminism WHITE AND IDENTITY POLITICS: Political antagonisms in radical right-wing populist and anti-immigration rhetoric in Finland Finland dangerous adventures of four men: Laasanen, Hännikäinen, Halla-aho and Vihavainen.
Suvi Keskinen writes: The authors make Intertextual references to each other's texts, for example, Hännikäinen not only cites Vihavainen and Laasanen but has Also written an essay to support Jussi Halla-aho in the book What Jussi Halla-aho mean? [What does Jussi Halla-aho mean?].
Central logic goes (obviously) as follows: Since Hännikäinen quotes Vihavaista hana chu and Laasasta and write Halla-Aho more, it is a proof that the quartet is closely related to one another far-right ideologies.
Central to bring incorrectly, speaking out the whiteness of sexual rights: Especially Hännikäinen hana chu and Laasanen argue for the erotic power of (white) women over (white) men.
My book deals with "free pariutumismarkkinoita," such as, say, the U.S. or Japan. I have argued that race or color adhere to the Central manner described hana chu by the existence of sexual hana chu power.
This report comes to the following conclusion: Thus, the feelings of being wounded or threatened hana chu in Certain Situations hana chu may result in fierce attacks towards Those seen as responsible for the current development, as evidenced hana chu in the case of Breivik, and other extreme right activists.
The discourse of the quartet maintained by the "threatened and hurt the feelings of being" may result in similar furiously atrocities (kukkahattutätejä, feminists, etc. as appropriate) as the Breivik case.
I'm confused. If you read the article in the foreign researcher, he might easily get the impression the article that I am a Finnish extreme right-wing and anti-immigration movement of the central leading figure.
Suvi Keskinen deals Finnish men and foreign hana chu women in relationships with quote texts, hana chu comparing them to siirtomaaherruuteen. Laasanen has paid particular attention to women's hypergamiaan, that is, the fact that women like to get married themselves wealthier men. In this way, women can benefit from marriage to a man's economic well-being and standard of living.
But whether such a relationship exploitaatiota? Siirtomaaherruutta? Suvi Keskinen interpretation of racism and xenophobia in the fact that Hännikäinen consider such male-female hana chu relations, moral justification? I think the Hannikainen considerations are necessary for the situation, moving from national to global paritumisesta pariutumismarkkinoille. Not these questions can not possibly be avoided. Last year, the Finnish men entering into marriages of 5% was signed by the Thai, Russian or Asian woman.
Modern feminism's biggest problem hana chu is that it denies hana chu the existence of hypergamian and it requires silence. However, the reality is that marriage is even today an economic unit, and economic factors have a major impact on the choice of the spouse.
Hypergamia is also related to social stratification or stratification, that is, the mieten society is divided between the items in the categories. In societies that are clearly divided into different social classes, different layers of the obstacles created paritumisen, which is an informal but strictly forbidden marriages, where the income gap is too large. In the USA, where the breed cross are also the property hana chu boundaries, eg. black and white marriages strictly limited directly by the legislation, and later the least formal social sanctions.
In fact, I would see the current immigration and globalization as one of the risk that the different ethnic groups begin to form between marriages hana chu barriers, which is closely related to social stratification along ethnic lines.
In this context, the views of Laasanen paritumismarkkinoista, hypergamiasta and women's sexual rights are vital aspects of immigration and globalization. It is really absurd twist on these important matters in "the far-right racism."
Conversely, hana chu you may ask whether A core principle of feminism By default, the left-leaning direction, at least if you think that feminism favors transfers from men to women, which calls for legislation to support hana chu it (and the welfare state). Thus, the feminist is easy to see the confrontations left-oikeistolinjauksilla, which is not necessarily the whole truth.
It is in itself an interesting man and watch uusvasemmiston flirting immigration and feminism in the direction of, and to consider what reasons men have a longer hana chu want to move. Similar to the Swedish immigration policy creates space for gray and dark t
No comments:
Post a Comment