Far too often the question: if the theory of evolution is wrong, why is studying at universities in

Entries specially created to respond to suspicions Almlahaddho Alladinin Rabobien and Christians and Jews and other appellants people or not people in Islam and Allah has ordered, but most people do not know
Topics Blog Free your mind from superstition (renewed) Why Islam right through!!?? (Dialogue between faith and atheism) series people or not people torpedo and trial coincidence (renewed) Selected Topics in the criticism of evolution (renewed) story of faith between philosophy and science and the Koran - Nadim bridge evidence physical existence of God and the presence of physics of the universe creator god - d. Sabri Demerdash God manifests itself in the age of science "book people or not people Evolution Deceit of gorgeous Harun Yahya book the fact of creation and the theory of evolution to open God Colin book contrarian physics hypothesis of evolution book contradict the science of chemistry to the hypothesis of evolution Book World atheist critic of Drvanih David Berlinski book (to respond to atheists people or not people Arabs), Book priests of atheism the new book by Dr. Haitham pleasure: Darwin's Black Box .. Michael Behe, Professor of Biochemistry pdf
The first fallacy by resorting to the majority of evolutionists and panting evidence http://antishobhat.blogspot.com/2013/03/blog-post_2.html Did you know that Darwin's religion is the only religion that need to impose the laws of the state to protect them from the questions and objections? http://www.fresnobee.com/ 2013/02/22/3184701 / terry-scambray-darwin-vs-cr eationists.html Why not refuse to scientists and academics theory of evolution?
Far too often the question: if the theory of evolution is wrong, why is studying at universities in the West. This translated to a hastily Introduction article biologist Jonathan Will, who is known to expose the forgery people or not people and deception supporters of Darwinism. . Please find the full article here: http://www.discovery.org/articleFile...fTheFakest.pdf people or not people science now knows that many of the pillars of darwinian theory are either false or misleading. Yet biology texts continue to present people or not people them as factual evidence people or not people of? Evolution. What does this imply about their scientific standards JONATHAN WELL
http://www.livecitizen.com/notice/3072 science now knows that many of the foundations of Darwin's theory is either false or misleading. people or not people Nevertheless, the biology texts continue to be submitted as evidence of a real evolution. So what does this mean for their standards of scientific? Jonathan Weil. If you ask me through my years of science at the University of Barkley Is believe in what you have learned in the science curriculum, the reaction was like the rest of my fellow people or not people students that I am surprised at a loss as to ask such a question, then I answer that we can, of course, that we find some lapses people or not people easy and typos. Science means constantly discovering new things, but I acknowledge that the scientific references school represents the best available scientific knowledge at the time. Then I noticed when I was on the verge of ending his doctoral thesis on cell biology people or not people and the development of cell and development biology what seemed like an anomaly strange, the book the school in which you use it it contains fees distinctive embryos some vertebrates such as fish, chicken, human and other, where he presented the similarities between them as evidence of a common ancestor. It was the graphics look similar, in fact, but I studied the embryos for a certain period, and looked at it under a microscope, I discovered that those fees clearly people or not people erroneous. I checked the other books which contained similar charges, she was also wrong. Not because it tarnished the form of embryos, but they have omitted the earlier stages, show the difference between them severe. Then you - as do most of the students people or not people and scientists - by ignoring it. Did not affect my work, where I assumed that the presence of this error, which somehow leaked to the books is the exception rather than the rule. In 1997 the British scientist embryos Michael Richardson and his colleagues published the results of a comparative study of embryos in charge of textbooks people or not people with real embryos, which revived my interest in those fees again. The newspaper quoted the prestigious Science SIENCE for Richardson himself saying: "This seems to be one of the largest counterfeiting operations in biology." Worse, this is not a scam recently, have not been revealed recently, Ferssom embryos in most textbooks - at the secondary level - High school either directly copied or simulated fees German biologist Ernst Darwinian structure Ernst Haeckel (s 19). The evolution people or not people and Darwinian scientists knew a hundred years ago it fake, but none of them had not seen fit to correct this misinformation circulating. Then I tried - and I continue to believe that it is a sobering exceptions - Find other errors relating to the theory of evolution in the references but the approved research led me to a startling fact: This was blatant people or not people misrepresentations often base and not the exception. Have named these misrepresentations in my recent book, "Icons of evolution" "Icons of Evolution", because many of them are represented and martyrdom have those fees "classic" widespread fee structure Ernst Haeckel, to serve a pedagogy is to install the misinformation about the theory of evolution in the minds of the public people or not people . We all remember the separation of biology: the experiment that created the "building blocks of life" in the tube laboratory, people or not people and the "tree" of evolution are rooted in the mud primitive, and that branch people or not people by the plant and animal life, and there were also skeletons identical, for example, stop human person and wing bird, and insect moths, birds and Darwin, and of course the structure of embryos Ernst Haeckel. All of these examples provide evidence people or not people of alleged Like the theory of evolution, then it turns out it is just plain wrong, there comes a slight errors.
, The texts contained massive distortions and even some faked evidence. Nor are we only talking about